Jotaro Kujo (
starmark) wrote in
prismatica2020-05-30 10:58 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
text, un: researcher
[ NOT POSTED TO NETWORK - DATASET ]
SURVEY ONE
RESPONDENT PAIRS
RELATIONSHIP TYPES
MOONBLESSING ATTRIBUTES OF DATAPOOL
MOONBLESSING ATTRIBUTES BY PAIRING TYPE
MOST COMMON REPORTED TRAIT
TIME SINCE ARRIVAL
OBSERVATIONS:
Every Sanguis in the S/I pairing type reports possessive behavior; most Irises report some form of clingy/needy behavior
Four of six Cordises report increased hunger, four of six Cordises report pheromones
Three of four cats report becoming ASSHOLES
One Iris in the C/I pairing type mentions essentially no symptoms of moonblessing
Three of six Irises in the C/I pairing type report going into heat, five of six report heightened affection
Five of eleven respondents have been here the same amount of time
Seven of eleven respondents have been here the same or within one month of each other
- ☆ ☆ ☆ -
SURVEY TWO
MOONBLESSING PREDICTIONS
OBSERVATIONS:
Of the seven actual responses, five thought they were going to be Iris.
Both respondents who guessed wrong about being Iris are actually Cordis.
No one guessed Iris and wound up Sanguis.
No one guessed they would be Cordis.
Two people guessed they would be Sanguis; one was correct and one was wrong.
The Sanguis who was wrong is actually an Iris.
>> People who are Iris seem to be slightly better at identifying that they will probably be Iris.
[ /DATASET ]
~
Hey, it's me again, the guy from last month who was doing that survey about the moonblessings.
I think I've got some pretty good data now so people who were interested in seeing a copy of that, you can message me here if you want and I'll share it.
Not sure what I'm going to do next but there's some good stuff to think about in here I think. So thanks if you participated.
And if you participated and were just stupid with your answers, well, guess what, science marched on anyway despite you.
RESPONDENT PAIRS
SANGUIS/CORDIS: SANGUIS/IRIS: CORDIS/IRIS: |
1 4 6 |
RELATIONSHIP TYPES
M/M M/F F/F |
4 5 2 |
(2 S/I, 2 C/I, 0 S/C) (2 S/I, 3 C/I, 0 S/C) (0 S/I, 1 C/I, 1 S/C) |
MOONBLESSING ATTRIBUTES OF DATAPOOL
SANGUIS: CORDIS: IRIS: |
WOLF - 4 RAM - 1 CAT - 5 KITSUNE - 1 WINGS (??) - 1 BAT - 3 JELLYFISH - 3 RABBIT - 1 DEER - 2 RACCOON - 1 |
MOONBLESSING ATTRIBUTES BY PAIRING TYPE
SANGUIS/IRIS: CORDIS/IRIS: SANGUIS/CORDIS: |
WOLF/BAT (2) RAM/JELLYFISH WOLF/RABBIT KITSUNE/BAT CAT/DEER (2) WINGS/JELLYFISH CAT/RACCOON CAT/JELLYFISH WOLF/CAT |
MOST COMMON REPORTED TRAIT
SANGUIS: CORDIS: IRIS: |
POSSESSIVENESS HUNGER PHEREMONES NEED FOR AFFECTION |
TIME SINCE ARRIVAL
ARRIVED SAME: ONE MONTH DIFF. > ONE MONTH DIFF. |
5 2 4 |
OBSERVATIONS:
SURVEY TWO
MOONBLESSING PREDICTIONS
GUESSED CORRECT: GUESSED INCORRECT: DECLINED TO GUESS: |
4 3 1 |
OBSERVATIONS:
>> People who are Iris seem to be slightly better at identifying that they will probably be Iris.
[ /DATASET ]
Hey, it's me again, the guy from last month who was doing that survey about the moonblessings.
I think I've got some pretty good data now so people who were interested in seeing a copy of that, you can message me here if you want and I'll share it.
Not sure what I'm going to do next but there's some good stuff to think about in here I think. So thanks if you participated.
And if you participated and were just stupid with your answers, well, guess what, science marched on anyway despite you.
no subject
[OH THAT'S RIGHT the people responding to his surveys have feelings. Right. Yes. Right.]
Sure, I...guess that would make more sense. How would you frame it, though?
no subject
Let's break it down. We want to focus on potential relationship problems, but don't want people to feel like we're asking them to spill their interpersonal drama to the network. Anonymity for respondents is obvious, but for the questions...
...how about something like 'Does your relationship undergo any changes when your moon is active? Positive changes or negative changes? Could you elaborate on your answer to the above?' etc. What do you think?
no subject
...But.
I guess I can see how your way would get better results.
no subject