necroyalty (
necroyalty) wrote in
prismatica2020-05-15 07:45 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- bungou to alchemist: atsushi nakajima,
- dragon age: isabela,
- good omens: aziraphale,
- gravity falls: stanford pines,
- hollow knight: the hollow knight,
- mahou sensei negima: konoka konoe,
- original character: ambrosine,
- original character: gwenhwyfar,
- resident evil: albert wesker,
- steven universe: lapis lazuli
text | un: undyingsoul
So, purely out of curiosity, I'd like to conduct a poll -
How far removed does something have to be from your own species for you to consider it
well
unorthodox
to have any sort of romantic aspirations with them?
I ask this mostly because I'm betrothed to a damned dragon in my own world (no, not a humanoid with draconic qualities, an actual, literal dragon) and apparently both of those are considered just a tad too extreme by most people's standards?
But then no reasonable human on my world would really consider another human at all strange for wanting to bed a goblin, or an elf, orc, dwarf, or what have you, so it appears the line has been drawn somewhere.
Not bothering with anonymity, because why in the Nine Hells not, but you're welcome to if you wish.
How far removed does something have to be from your own species for you to consider it
well
unorthodox
to have any sort of romantic aspirations with them?
I ask this mostly because I'm betrothed to a damned dragon in my own world (no, not a humanoid with draconic qualities, an actual, literal dragon) and apparently both of those are considered just a tad too extreme by most people's standards?
But then no reasonable human on my world would really consider another human at all strange for wanting to bed a goblin, or an elf, orc, dwarf, or what have you, so it appears the line has been drawn somewhere.
Not bothering with anonymity, because why in the Nine Hells not, but you're welcome to if you wish.
un: tigerpoet
Re: un: tigerpoet
Among most of the mortal races I described the general configuration is the same as in humans, give or take a little in terms of size.
We do have a few species that are genuinely incompatible with humans, though, such as the aarakocra.
I'll never forget the time my thirteen year old self had to look up what a cloaca was.
no subject
no subject
We also have lizardfolk.
Whose women do not have breasts, regardless of what some terrible art I've seen will tell you. (Seriously, why would they? They lay eggs, they don't nurse their young, but I'm getting ahead of myself.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've certainly never seen breasts the size of a human man's head on any goblin woman before, so it's certainly improbable.
But they do have them. Unlike the lizardfolk.
no subject
no subject
If "thicc", and I am loathe to use that word, but if "thicc" goblins do exist, I've never seen one.
no subject
no subject
But then why not just use that word?
Or consult a thesaurus?
Or any other myriad options other than forgetting the letter k exists?
no subject
no subject
It's not going to be often, that's correct, but if you're going to, then...
Okay, you get my point.
no subject