starmark: (OPTIMIST ☆ it's a big blue watery road)
Jotaro Kujo ([personal profile] starmark) wrote in [community profile] prismatica2020-05-30 10:58 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:

text, un: researcher

[ NOT POSTED TO NETWORK - DATASET ]


SURVEY ONE

RESPONDENT PAIRS
SANGUIS/CORDIS:
SANGUIS/IRIS:
CORDIS/IRIS:		 1
4
6

RELATIONSHIP TYPES
M/M
M/F
F/F		 4
5
2		 (2 S/I, 2 C/I, 0 S/C)
(2 S/I, 3 C/I, 0 S/C)
(0 S/I, 1 C/I, 1 S/C)

MOONBLESSING ATTRIBUTES OF DATAPOOL
SANGUIS:


CORDIS:



IRIS:		 WOLF - 4
RAM - 1

CAT - 5
KITSUNE - 1
WINGS (??) - 1

BAT - 3
JELLYFISH - 3
RABBIT - 1
DEER - 2
RACCOON - 1

MOONBLESSING ATTRIBUTES BY PAIRING TYPE
SANGUIS/IRIS:



CORDIS/IRIS:





SANGUIS/CORDIS:		 WOLF/BAT (2)
RAM/JELLYFISH
WOLF/RABBIT

KITSUNE/BAT
CAT/DEER (2)
WINGS/JELLYFISH
CAT/RACCOON
CAT/JELLYFISH

WOLF/CAT

MOST COMMON REPORTED TRAIT
SANGUIS:

CORDIS:


IRIS:		 POSSESSIVENESS

HUNGER
PHEREMONES

NEED FOR AFFECTION

TIME SINCE ARRIVAL
ARRIVED SAME:
ONE MONTH DIFF.
> ONE MONTH DIFF.		 5
2
4

OBSERVATIONS:

  • Every Sanguis in the S/I pairing type reports possessive behavior; most Irises report some form of clingy/needy behavior

  • Four of six Cordises report increased hunger, four of six Cordises report pheromones

  • Three of four cats report becoming ASSHOLES

  • One Iris in the C/I pairing type mentions essentially no symptoms of moonblessing

  • Three of six Irises in the C/I pairing type report going into heat, five of six report heightened affection

  • Five of eleven respondents have been here the same amount of time

  • Seven of eleven respondents have been here the same or within one month of each other


    • - ☆ ☆ ☆ -


    SURVEY TWO

    MOONBLESSING PREDICTIONS
    GUESSED CORRECT:
    GUESSED INCORRECT:
    DECLINED TO GUESS:    		 4
    3
    1

    OBSERVATIONS:

  • Of the seven actual responses, five thought they were going to be Iris.

  • Both respondents who guessed wrong about being Iris are actually Cordis.

  • No one guessed Iris and wound up Sanguis.

  • No one guessed they would be Cordis.

  • Two people guessed they would be Sanguis; one was correct and one was wrong.

  • The Sanguis who was wrong is actually an Iris.


    • >> People who are Iris seem to be slightly better at identifying that they will probably be Iris.


    [ /DATASET ]

    ~

    Hey, it's me again, the guy from last month who was doing that survey about the moonblessings.

    I think I've got some pretty good data now so people who were interested in seeing a copy of that, you can message me here if you want and I'll share it.

    Not sure what I'm going to do next but there's some good stuff to think about in here I think. So thanks if you participated.

    And if you participated and were just stupid with your answers, well, guess what, science marched on anyway despite you.
    Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
    burningfree: (Lio68)

    [personal profile] burningfree 2020-05-31 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
    "Probably not"?

    Sure. Are you asking for real names to keep track of, then, Mr. Anonymous Researcher?

    [Okay maybe Lio is just a pain in the ass anyway. He really can't help it.]
    starmark: (BEHIND ☆ is he posing in a parked car)

    [personal profile] starmark 2020-05-31 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
    If you're so worried about this, why don't you go interrogate the people asking for it? You can see them all on this post.

    You clearly don't trust the way I'm doing it, so just do it yourself.
    burningfree: (Lio4)

    [personal profile] burningfree 2020-05-31 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
    Fine. If someone jumps out to me as suspicious, I will.

    [Lio totally can and will make a list of names.]

    I only recognize Abbacchio. I at least trust him. A little irritated about the guy whose username is basically 'professor'. Do you actually know him?
    starmark: (DAZED ☆ for god's sake just let him rest)

    [personal profile] starmark 2020-05-31 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
    Yes. What the hell is there to be irritated about? That's his title. He's a professor.
    burningfree: (Lio17)

    [personal profile] burningfree 2020-05-31 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
    Didn't I tell you last time I'm suspicious of researchers and scientists??

    Sorry the bias is still there.
    starmark: (UNAMUSED ☆ that's great but can you not)

    [personal profile] starmark 2020-05-31 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
    You're suspicious of him because of the name he's using on the internet.

    Not because of anything he said or did. Just because of the name he picked.
    burningfree: (Lio48)

    [personal profile] burningfree 2020-05-31 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
    [...]

    Wow, yeah, that's stupid, isn't it?

    Sorry, I think I'm just in a bad mood cause I know tomorrow's Sanguis and I'm not looking forward to it. And I'm just bad at this social media thing on a good day.

    [But hopelessly addicted to it.]
    starmark: (TALENT ☆ jotaro why are you like this)

    [personal profile] starmark 2020-06-02 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
    Well, Sanguis does that to people, I guess.

    Though if you ask me, it's a lot better than the other ones. I've seen them all and if I had to pick one, I'd pick Sanguis.
    burningfree: (Lio68)

    [personal profile] burningfree 2020-06-02 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
    I would too, for personal reasons, but I think Iris gets a bad rap. My partner is Iris and I think it helped a lot with getting him used to being with me. He also doesn't seem to mind it nearly as much as every other Iris I've seen.

    Take that as you will, I guess, Mr. Researcher. We were a month late to your survey.
    Flat | Top-Level Comments Only