Reimi Sugimoto (
doreimi) wrote in
prismatica2019-09-13 10:43 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- ace attorney: dick gumshoe,
- bleach: kurosaki ichigo,
- bungou to alchemist: atsushi nakajima,
- jojo's bizarre adventure: reimi sugimoto,
- mo dao zu shi: lan sizhui,
- persona 3: minako arisato,
- persona 5: futaba sakura,
- persona 5: goro akechi,
- team fortress 2: engineer,
- wadanohara and the great blue sea: lobco
anonymous text, un: ANON
i have a question. there's no right or wrong answer, i'm just wondering what people think.
suppose somebody came here, and outwardly they seemed like an average person. kept to themselves, didn't make trouble, maybe were a little bit weird but not, like, offensively so. you've never seen them do anything wrong. they seem pretty harmless. they're just a normal, fine, generally boring person.
then imagine somebody else said that they knew that person, and that all the niceness was just an act, and really that person was dangerous. really dangerous. and that the person hurt people in really bad ways. but imagine there was no proof of it, really, just that upset person's word against the boring person's.
how would you decide who to believe? would you only go by what you saw yourself, or only by what happened here and not where they came from, or what? would you believe anyone at all?
like i said, there's no right or wrong answer, i guess. i just wonder how you would make a decision either way, in a situation like that.
suppose somebody came here, and outwardly they seemed like an average person. kept to themselves, didn't make trouble, maybe were a little bit weird but not, like, offensively so. you've never seen them do anything wrong. they seem pretty harmless. they're just a normal, fine, generally boring person.
then imagine somebody else said that they knew that person, and that all the niceness was just an act, and really that person was dangerous. really dangerous. and that the person hurt people in really bad ways. but imagine there was no proof of it, really, just that upset person's word against the boring person's.
how would you decide who to believe? would you only go by what you saw yourself, or only by what happened here and not where they came from, or what? would you believe anyone at all?
like i said, there's no right or wrong answer, i guess. i just wonder how you would make a decision either way, in a situation like that.
private text | un: bellabelle
You probably guessed it was me, huh.
private text
private text
It sounds like a lot of people wouldn't want to take a side either way. They'd give him a chance to prove himself as a good person. Which means somebody else would have to get hurt before they'd believe it.
private text
private text
...But I guess it would make sense, wouldn't it, for him to try to get rid of me first. Since I'm the proof of what he did.
private text
And you're right, he'll come after you first, probably. But we'll take care of it.
private text
Maybe we could use me as bait, and that would give you enough time to get him.
private text
Bait, though?
private text
private text
[ He doesn't LOVE it... ]
private text
Arnold and I spent all that time in the alley coming up with plans for what we'd do if he ever showed up, and it was a good thing we did. He grabbed me and tried to get me to turn around, right at the end. If we hadn't been ready for him, I would've been the one dragged to hell, and not him.
private text
It's good you weren't.
private text
private text
private text
Some people will believe us, though, if it happens. That's really good to know.
private text
private text
private text
private text
private text
private text
This is just for if I need it. For emergencies.
private text