Reimi Sugimoto (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
doreimi) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
prismatica2019-09-13 10:43 pm
doreimi) wrote in prismatica2019-09-13 10:43 pm
Entry tags:
- ace attorney: dick gumshoe,
- bleach: kurosaki ichigo,
- bungou to alchemist: atsushi nakajima,
- jojo's bizarre adventure: reimi sugimoto,
- mo dao zu shi: lan sizhui,
- persona 3: minako arisato,
- persona 5: futaba sakura,
- persona 5: goro akechi,
- team fortress 2: engineer,
- wadanohara and the great blue sea: lobco
anonymous text, un: ANON
i have a question. there's no right or wrong answer, i'm just wondering what people think.
suppose somebody came here, and outwardly they seemed like an average person. kept to themselves, didn't make trouble, maybe were a little bit weird but not, like, offensively so. you've never seen them do anything wrong. they seem pretty harmless. they're just a normal, fine, generally boring person.
then imagine somebody else said that they knew that person, and that all the niceness was just an act, and really that person was dangerous. really dangerous. and that the person hurt people in really bad ways. but imagine there was no proof of it, really, just that upset person's word against the boring person's.
how would you decide who to believe? would you only go by what you saw yourself, or only by what happened here and not where they came from, or what? would you believe anyone at all?
like i said, there's no right or wrong answer, i guess. i just wonder how you would make a decision either way, in a situation like that.
suppose somebody came here, and outwardly they seemed like an average person. kept to themselves, didn't make trouble, maybe were a little bit weird but not, like, offensively so. you've never seen them do anything wrong. they seem pretty harmless. they're just a normal, fine, generally boring person.
then imagine somebody else said that they knew that person, and that all the niceness was just an act, and really that person was dangerous. really dangerous. and that the person hurt people in really bad ways. but imagine there was no proof of it, really, just that upset person's word against the boring person's.
how would you decide who to believe? would you only go by what you saw yourself, or only by what happened here and not where they came from, or what? would you believe anyone at all?
like i said, there's no right or wrong answer, i guess. i just wonder how you would make a decision either way, in a situation like that.
text; un: orpheus
i usually want to see the best in everyone, but ive had experience with people like that and it didnt go well...
id trust the person speaking up. try to find out more.
permanon
it seems like most people wouldn't make any snap judgments but would try to find out both sides of things. pretty few have said "it's enough just that someone spoke up".
no subject
a huge blanket answer to this is kind of hard... but i really think its important to listen to people when they speak up about stuff like this, you know? most people aren't going to make up something that serious. even more in a place like this, about a person who acts like that
no subject
i think having people listen to you and believe you is really underrated, when it comes to how important it is.