It seems counter-active, though, in the least. Crush those few enemies and make many hundred, maybe thousands more once other people learn of the murder of those like them, or at the very least have the wary distrust of those who wonder if they disagree even slightly if they'll end up like the others.
What's the old adage - Friends close and enemies closer?
To history a slaughter is only portrayed as good by those who carried it out, at any rate.
I would say that would be the misstep that lead to the killing.
no subject
It seems counter-active, though, in the least. Crush those few enemies and make many hundred, maybe thousands more once other people learn of the murder of those like them, or at the very least have the wary distrust of those who wonder if they disagree even slightly if they'll end up like the others.
What's the old adage - Friends close and enemies closer?
To history a slaughter is only portrayed as good by those who carried it out, at any rate.
I would say that would be the misstep that lead to the killing.