vanity: (pic#14182943)
𝕥𝕒𝕞𝕒𝕜𝕚 𝕤𝕦𝕠𝕙 ([personal profile] vanity) wrote in [community profile] prismatica2020-11-01 08:49 pm

text; un @suohtamaki


greetings everyone! i apologize that i have fallen off on my blog posting, but i have found MANY MANY ACTIVITIES to occupy my time here. unfortunately, i have come down with a case of tunnel vision and neglected to be hospitable to my fellow residents in the interim.

so! i am having a little get together in two weeks (ง ื▿ ื)ว are you interested? it shall be hosted by three fine gentlemen looking for other equally hospitable persons who want to hang out in our appropriately decorated apartment. (chroma harvesting is not the intention).

i shall be supplying refreshments and hors d'oeuvres, though you are also encouraged to bring samplers and cuisine if you like! i am quite the sucker for trying new things from various cultures, especially the food of the laymen. i have amassed an extensive collection of doritos for this party, including some limited edition bags that cost me quite a fortune. please let's not let them go to waste.

also the party is pet friendly, all animals welcome! ʕ •ᴥ• ʔ (example: a bear, though perhaps only trained bears)

please let me know if you have specific requests for food, music, or activities.

sincerely Σ>―(〃°ω°〃)♡→ suoh tamaki


there will indeed be a party log on the 14th and there will indeed be many doritos
ends: (listening.)

[personal profile] ends 2020-11-10 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
the phrasing made it sound a little...

[ judgmental of the consumer? like cheap junk for the impoverished layman was some amusing concept? neither of those is particularly light-hearted though, so he abandons them in favor of a kinder presentation. ]

... overselling on the greatness of junk food? sometimes it gets you through to your next work shift so you don’t pass out or whatever, but it’s not exactly top notch.

so why you’d spend a fortune on them is a little confusing. unless that was sarcasm I missed?