decisiveconquest: (ʀᴀɪɴ)
DAENERYS "sᴛᴏʀᴍʙᴏʀɴ" TARGARYEN ([personal profile] decisiveconquest) wrote in [community profile] prismatica2019-10-06 12:57 am

(Text; UN: motherofdragons)

I will not hide my identity nor pretend these words are not attached to me. There were men who thought I committed many wrongs before I came here. One man held me accountable and spared me nothing besides a lingering death, which leads me to my question: in your estimation, are there any crimes that are unforgivable?

What a common man or woman cannot - should not - do, a king or a queen can do for the good of their people, correct? Great sacrifices are expected in battle - in war - however do you think that a ruler's life should be forfeit for them? What good can they do if they are slain prematurely?

I can admit when I am wrong, but on this...

I don't understand.
the_archivist: (Idea)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-08 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, the country went on to be the biggest empire in history spanning about a quarter of the globe without needing an absolute monarchy so...

But going back to the original question, if the monarch holds absolute power, how are they supposed to be held to account?You can't just vote for an opposition.
the_archivist: (Concern)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-12 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sure there are plenty of areas of the world that are doing just fine and would prefer not to be ruled by someone else.

And sure, advice is good. But an absolute monarch doesn't have to take the advice. But the council can't really hold the monarch to account. They can't remove them from power if they're just terrible.
the_archivist: (Default)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-16 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Because sometimes people are terrible and power hungry. Sometimes they stop seeing people as people and see them as... lesser.

So you support assassination as a method of regime change?
the_archivist: (Watching)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-18 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
One person's justice. One person's idea of equality.

They should. But that's what happens when there's no way to bloodlessly removing the head of state.
the_archivist: (Stupidest thing I've ever heard)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-22 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Doesn't make you the best judge, the best person to be arbiter of all that is good and right. A bloodline doesn't magically bestow skill.
the_archivist: (Default)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-23 09:34 am (UTC)(link)
Having the luck of being born into wealth and a particular bloodline doesn't make you any more qualified.

If you gave any random person without a 'bloodline' and gave them the same wealth and opportunity, they'd probably do just as well. This is the kind of thing that keeps normal people from attending the best schools and universities.
the_archivist: (Tell me your secrets)

Re: Text

[personal profile] the_archivist 2019-10-23 10:01 am (UTC)(link)
I studied history too. Doesn't make me a good leader.

I'm sorry you had a hard time. But a fluke of birth doesn't give someone any more right to be in charge than anyone else. And there have been plenty of people with the strength to conquer who . have committed atrocities and been poor rulers.