guangyao: (Default)
金光瑶 𝗷𝗶𝗻 𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘆𝗮𝗼 ([personal profile] guangyao) wrote in [community profile] prismatica2019-11-01 10:52 am

text; un: anonymous

A curious, hypothetical question to put forwards to people here after reading something.

If someone you know commits crimes up to the point of murder, how far should the punishment go before they can consider it enough? Would it ever be enough?

Alternatively while I have this thing open; all the coffee tastes the same. Is there truly a difference between the different kinds the stores are offering?


[ Look, it's hard work being stuck in a bathtub as a mermaid sometimes, okay?]
beitangmoran: (serious2)

text; un: Moran

[personal profile] beitangmoran 2019-11-02 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
Murder is unacceptable and brings disorder to the nation. The only acceptable punishment is execution.

Whether or not I know the person is wholly irrelevant.
beitangmoran: (smug2)

[personal profile] beitangmoran 2019-11-02 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
This is starting from a false premise that the means of committing it matter. It is not how it is carried out that makes the murder, it is the intent.