Zed O'Brien (
flying_fish) wrote in
prismatica2020-07-14 08:28 pm
Entry tags:
[Text] @zobrien
[Zed isn't in the best of moods since another person he cared for disappeared, so he's taken to drink. Not that the alcohol has ever helped him, but it has him thinking about home...and some not so pleasant business back there.]
There's an item back home that operates like the Chinese gu. Except instead of venomous creatures, you insert humans. It is said that once the ritual is complete, it will lead to the destruction of the world.
The humans inside are forced to kill each other and mix together until becoming one being. The skin disappears while the skeleton, muscles, and organs fuse together. They're neither dead nor alive because of the magic that binds them.
Let's say the item broke, and a part of the conglomerate was separated from the whole. The humans that make up this "specimen" are children. Do you destroy it to prevent the ritual from being completed?
There's an item back home that operates like the Chinese gu. Except instead of venomous creatures, you insert humans. It is said that once the ritual is complete, it will lead to the destruction of the world.
The humans inside are forced to kill each other and mix together until becoming one being. The skin disappears while the skeleton, muscles, and organs fuse together. They're neither dead nor alive because of the magic that binds them.
Let's say the item broke, and a part of the conglomerate was separated from the whole. The humans that make up this "specimen" are children. Do you destroy it to prevent the ritual from being completed?

UN: L-B-
That's a horrifying concept, and I'd like to know what sort of madman would create such a thing.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
:)
However, it sounds as though the results of this ritual is nothing but hear-say.
Do you believe in their words?
/points at
The world's collapse has been stopped before, but even if this item didn't destroy the world entirely, the damage would be overwhelming.
points back at u..
As for your answer: yes, I would destroy it.
A few lives opposed to over a billion matter little. They have been experimented on, as well.
Would they know anything else out of their life as stock?
(no subject)
no subject
That's not an easy question. But assuming you've already determined there's no way to bring them back to life, then I don't think you'd need to consider the likelihood of the ritual at all.
After all, if the only thing holding you back is that they're children, then you're not holding back for their sake. All humans are capable of suffering. Keeping them in that state just to avoid shouldering the guilt of killing a child would be selfish.
Of course, it's easy enough to say that. Actually carrying it out is a different matter.
no subject
Carrying it out is more complicated. Two powerful Blood Breeds had appeared to reclaim it. So there's the issue of not dying while keeping the specimen safe and destroying it.
no subject
["Saving them" in this instance meaning "Putting them to rest properly" of course.]
[Also, he's nearly there. By the time Zed finishes his next reply, he'll get a knock on his door.]
But honestly, why are really evil people so obsessed with destroying the world anyway?
Aren't they living in it?
If they hate it so much, they should just focus on something useful, like space travel.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
tldr: sensei dokidokis
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: prof.asuka
It's similar to the Trolley Problem in ethics.
no subject
You're not alone in your answer. I can't say I disagree either on a rational level. The group I was with was split, however, but there was talk of moving the specimen to a place where it could be destroyed.
no subject
You can only be rational. If you spend a lot of time trying to save one, you could fail and lose them all. Do people think they're doing someone a favor by delaying the inevitable.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
sorry for the late, had to take a mini hiatus
all good ~ ♥
[text] un: idealist
How did you come up with this question, anyway?
no subject
There are several in my group who think similarly to you.
It's what I remember before returning here.
no subject
If I allow for an innocent being to die on my watch again, I couldn't live with the guilt. Especially if it were a child.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text | j.valentine
I'd destroy it.
There's only going forward.
no subject
Would you have any doubts?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
anonymous text, un: ANON
First, am I correct in assuming that the "specimen" separated from the whole before it reached the state of being "neither dead nor alive"? To clarify: is the specimen still in the stage of being sapient, separate individuals?
Second, how absolute is my certainty that this ritual will, in fact, destroy the world as claimed?
no subject
2) Around 85% certain that the world will be destroyed. 100% that there will be massive casualties if it is completed. However, there is no guarantee that something has already been created to stop this item in particular, but it is unlikely. The divine archive that is was documented in was only brought up from the underworld 2 years ago.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: athanasia
no subject
I'm not looking for a particular answer that I would deem correct.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
UN: shiliu
Tell me more about this item. How is it constructed? Is there any way of freeing the people caught within it? Either separating them or helping the being created?
no subject
There is no immediate method of separating the people, but it seems the Charops Jinko can be destroyed. A similar item to it was destroyed, so it can be assumed it can as well.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
un: li_min
That sure is something familiar.]
That would depend on many things, wouldn't it? How inevitable is the destruction of the world? Does the specimen still want to live?
And why, exactly, are you asking?
no subject
I do not know if the humans that are part of the specimen want to live. If they were Beyondians, it may be a different matter depending on the species. Some Beyondians may be accepting of becoming one with many, but it is still a painful method. However, the specimen is only made up of humans.
I was thinking about what I get to look forward to when I return home.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[ private ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)