flying_fish: (Angstangstangst)
Zed O'Brien ([personal profile] flying_fish) wrote in [community profile] prismatica2020-07-14 08:28 pm

[Text] @zobrien

[Zed isn't in the best of moods since another person he cared for disappeared, so he's taken to drink. Not that the alcohol has ever helped him, but it has him thinking about home...and some not so pleasant business back there.]

There's an item back home that operates like the Chinese gu. Except instead of venomous creatures, you insert humans. It is said that once the ritual is complete, it will lead to the destruction of the world.

The humans inside are forced to kill each other and mix together until becoming one being. The skin disappears while the skeleton, muscles, and organs fuse together. They're neither dead nor alive because of the magic that binds them.

Let's say the item broke, and a part of the conglomerate was separated from the whole. The humans that make up this "specimen" are children. Do you destroy it to prevent the ritual from being completed?
roseblooms: didn't you pay attention playing metal gear solid (AWAIT ❁ more dangerous than a jackal)

anonymous text, un: ANON

[personal profile] roseblooms 2020-07-15 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I have two questions, prior to answering this thought experiment of yours:

First, am I correct in assuming that the "specimen" separated from the whole before it reached the state of being "neither dead nor alive"? To clarify: is the specimen still in the stage of being sapient, separate individuals?

Second, how absolute is my certainty that this ritual will, in fact, destroy the world as claimed?
roseblooms: guess what, i'm always working, bish (TEMPT ❁ you want a maserati)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2020-07-15 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Divine archives are not always trustworthy. Is there any independent corroboration for that 100% figure?

I realize this sounds like hair-splitting, but my answer hinges on the credibility of the information.
roseblooms: this arrangement is a merger, not an acquisition (PROFILE ❁ obligatory mulan reference go)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2020-07-15 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Firsthand evidence, then.

In that case, yes. I destroy the specimen.
roseblooms: you get dandelions and thistles because fuck you (GROW ❁ never promised you a rose garden)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2020-07-16 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Whether the specimen was still discrete individuals or not actually had no bearing on my answer; I simply don't believe I have the right to be spared the moral burden of knowing exactly what it is that I'm choosing to do. If I'm to kill them, I should be forced to know who I'm killing.

Without the corroborating information, I would naturally mistrust you as a source of reliable information. It's far too easy to manipulate murder on one man's basis of "trust me, it's necessary".
roseblooms: am i being coy or reaching for the hand grenade in my hair, who can say (BRUSH ❁ sorry did you say something)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2020-07-18 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I've seen firsthand the damage that blind faith, even the sort driven by the best of intentions, can cause. Combine that with a scenario that implicates black-and-white morality, and the results can be horrific.

Note, though, that there's a difference between mistrust and disbelief. Just because I wouldn't automatically believe that your information was reliable doesn't mean I would discount the possibility. Quite the contrary — that's precisely why I would want to investigate further for support of it.
roseblooms: this could only be more tropey if i were a megane (HMMM ❁ the obligatory smartguy pose)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2020-07-25 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
I see. So you faced threats on a number of fronts — unwilling to allow the specimen to be claimed by the bodyguards, but incapable of dealing with it without incurring the wrath of the hospital staff.

The sort of moment that necessitates abrupt action and a snap decision. It's difficult to be certain you're doing the right thing, under such circumstances. You can only choose, and live with the results.