Zed O'Brien (
flying_fish) wrote in
prismatica2020-07-14 08:28 pm
Entry tags:
[Text] @zobrien
[Zed isn't in the best of moods since another person he cared for disappeared, so he's taken to drink. Not that the alcohol has ever helped him, but it has him thinking about home...and some not so pleasant business back there.]
There's an item back home that operates like the Chinese gu. Except instead of venomous creatures, you insert humans. It is said that once the ritual is complete, it will lead to the destruction of the world.
The humans inside are forced to kill each other and mix together until becoming one being. The skin disappears while the skeleton, muscles, and organs fuse together. They're neither dead nor alive because of the magic that binds them.
Let's say the item broke, and a part of the conglomerate was separated from the whole. The humans that make up this "specimen" are children. Do you destroy it to prevent the ritual from being completed?
There's an item back home that operates like the Chinese gu. Except instead of venomous creatures, you insert humans. It is said that once the ritual is complete, it will lead to the destruction of the world.
The humans inside are forced to kill each other and mix together until becoming one being. The skin disappears while the skeleton, muscles, and organs fuse together. They're neither dead nor alive because of the magic that binds them.
Let's say the item broke, and a part of the conglomerate was separated from the whole. The humans that make up this "specimen" are children. Do you destroy it to prevent the ritual from being completed?

no subject
2) Around 85% certain that the world will be destroyed. 100% that there will be massive casualties if it is completed. However, there is no guarantee that something has already been created to stop this item in particular, but it is unlikely. The divine archive that is was documented in was only brought up from the underworld 2 years ago.
no subject
I realize this sounds like hair-splitting, but my answer hinges on the credibility of the information.
no subject
When the jar broke, the incomplete conglomerate was able to escape temporarily and killed or maimed the majority of people outside within an 8 block radius in the span of a few minutes.
no subject
In that case, yes. I destroy the specimen.
no subject
Would your answer be different without the additional information?
no subject
Without the corroborating information, I would naturally mistrust you as a source of reliable information. It's far too easy to manipulate murder on one man's basis of "trust me, it's necessary".
no subject
no subject
Note, though, that there's a difference between mistrust and disbelief. Just because I wouldn't automatically believe that your information was reliable doesn't mean I would discount the possibility. Quite the contrary — that's precisely why I would want to investigate further for support of it.
no subject
The situation I described is more complex in reality, so investigating further was not an option. We were in a hospital, and the option of moving the specimen elsewhere was posed because the staff are magically obligated to prevent any deaths on the grounds. The real problem is that a dimensional gateway opened up, and the bodyguards for the auction house had arrived for the specimen.
no subject
The sort of moment that necessitates abrupt action and a snap decision. It's difficult to be certain you're doing the right thing, under such circumstances. You can only choose, and live with the results.