DAENERYS "sᴛᴏʀᴍʙᴏʀɴ" TARGARYEN (
decisiveconquest) wrote in
prismatica2019-10-06 12:57 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(Text; UN: motherofdragons)
I will not hide my identity nor pretend these words are not attached to me. There were men who thought I committed many wrongs before I came here. One man held me accountable and spared me nothing besides a lingering death, which leads me to my question: in your estimation, are there any crimes that are unforgivable?
What a common man or woman cannot - should not - do, a king or a queen can do for the good of their people, correct? Great sacrifices are expected in battle - in war - however do you think that a ruler's life should be forfeit for them? What good can they do if they are slain prematurely?
I can admit when I am wrong, but on this...
I don't understand.
What a common man or woman cannot - should not - do, a king or a queen can do for the good of their people, correct? Great sacrifices are expected in battle - in war - however do you think that a ruler's life should be forfeit for them? What good can they do if they are slain prematurely?
I can admit when I am wrong, but on this...
I don't understand.
Text
Re: Text
A few countries still have monarchs. They're just figureheads for the most part.
Text
The Seven Kingdoms have no other way to be united.
Re: Text
But going back to the original question, if the monarch holds absolute power, how are they supposed to be held to account?You can't just vote for an opposition.
Text
They have councils, usually, and they listen to the advice they are given before making any major decision.
Re: Text
And sure, advice is good. But an absolute monarch doesn't have to take the advice. But the council can't really hold the monarch to account. They can't remove them from power if they're just terrible.
Text
They can use a sword or a knife like anyone else. The monarch isn't immortal.
Re: Text
So you support assassination as a method of regime change?
Text
Never. But I accept that it does happen. All monarchs should be wary of it.
Re: Text
They should. But that's what happens when there's no way to bloodlessly removing the head of state.
Text
Re: Text
Text
I was born a Targaryen, I conquered, I secured the throne, so, therefore, I had the right.
Re: Text
If you gave any random person without a 'bloodline' and gave them the same wealth and opportunity, they'd probably do just as well. This is the kind of thing that keeps normal people from attending the best schools and universities.
Text
Before I became a Khaleesi, I was educated thoroughly on Westeros and its long history. I was taught where my ancestors failed and where they triumphed. I was expected to be a good queen to my brother, however he was unfit for the throne. I carried on in his stead, crossing deserts, conquering cities and eventually crossing the sea in order to reclaim my birthright.
Do not think it was handed to me on a platter.
Re: Text
I'm sorry you had a hard time. But a fluke of birth doesn't give someone any more right to be in charge than anyone else. And there have been plenty of people with the strength to conquer who . have committed atrocities and been poor rulers.
Text